<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the Timer more steady</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novio.be/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564</link>
	<description>facts, findings &#38; fantasies on interactive media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Time Tracker, easy time tracking &#124; Randomize Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564&#038;cpage=1#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Tracker, easy time tracking &#124; Randomize Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>[...] IDE and compiled it against the Adobe Air 1.5 runtime. Many thanks to Hans Van de Velde for his SteadyTimer class. The SteadyTimer class fixes the lagging problem of the AS3 Timer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IDE and compiled it against the Adobe Air 1.5 runtime. Many thanks to Hans Van de Velde for his SteadyTimer class. The SteadyTimer class fixes the lagging problem of the AS3 Timer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnovc</title>
		<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564&#038;cpage=1#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>bnovc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>This does not work for timers that take less than a second or so.

Running at 1/3rd of a second intervals, it loses on average 9.2ms (over a few minute test).

Running at 1/20th of a second, it is basically useless. I&#039;m getting 10ms between some executions and 100 between others.

I haven&#039;t figured out a way around that yet, but I figured maybe you or a person reading this may know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not work for timers that take less than a second or so.</p>
<p>Running at 1/3rd of a second intervals, it loses on average 9.2ms (over a few minute test).</p>
<p>Running at 1/20th of a second, it is basically useless. I&#8217;m getting 10ms between some executions and 100 between others.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t figured out a way around that yet, but I figured maybe you or a person reading this may know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Van de Velde</title>
		<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564&#038;cpage=1#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Van de Velde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Ok thanks, I&#039;ve updated the code with a getTimer() iso a Date object. In general, I try not to use global functions but if it&#039;s better for performance then I&#039;m a fan :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok thanks, I&#8217;ve updated the code with a getTimer() iso a Date object. In general, I try not to use global functions but if it&#8217;s better for performance then I&#8217;m a fan <img src='http://www.novio.be/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564&#038;cpage=1#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Looking at your implementation, I see one issue...

You are creating a new Date object on every tick. Waste of resources and leads to potential garbage collector slowdowns. You can do the same thing with getTimer() which returns the milliseconds since the SWF started running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at your implementation, I see one issue&#8230;</p>
<p>You are creating a new Date object on every tick. Waste of resources and leads to potential garbage collector slowdowns. You can do the same thing with getTimer() which returns the milliseconds since the SWF started running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564&#038;cpage=1#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novio.be/blog/?p=564#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Yup.... 2 years ago. :)

http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=910</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230;. 2 years ago. <img src='http://www.novio.be/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=910" rel="nofollow">http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=910</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
